Fictional City, Real Solutions
What can a fictional city teach us about planning for real ones?
Earlier this year, we submitted an entry for ITE’s “Optimizing Main St.” competition. The prompt: “optimize the right-of-way for a corridor that could serve as an example in terms of balancing corridor needs, safety, operations, mobility, equity, and livability.” The corridor in question was a one-mile stretch of Main St. in the imaginary City of Neverland. Among the competition’s parameters, our entry had to provide bus stops, accessible parking, and flex curbside uses while maintaining at least one vehicular travel lane in each direction.
Our vision is for a street that functions as a safe and effective transportation corridor as well as desirable public space, serves the social needs of residents, and creates an active and thriving retail base. This corridor supports the essential needs of businesses and residents while maximizing space for people outside vehicles. It applies equitable infrastructure upgrades to ensure equal safety outcomes for all users, regardless of mode, age, or ability.
In the below images, we’ve highlighted some of the key features of this ambitious proposal.
SAFETY
At the center of our approach for this busy corridor is to elevate Vision Zero design principles to create a welcoming and lively urban environment free of fatalities and serious injuries. The design creates public spaces that are accessible to all, especially the most vulnerable users, by providing as much protected space for each mode as possible (using physical separators), lowering speeds to reduce the severity of potential impacts, carefully designing shared/mixing zones where unavoidable conflicts would be concentrated (using creative designs and pavement markings), and clearly defining how different spaces function (using innovative signage and pavement markings).
OPERATION AND CURB MANAGEMENT
Studies have estimated that about 30 percent of traffic in urban centers is cruising while searching for available parking. Efficient parking management can reduce cruising for parking and reduce double parking, which lowers the likelihood of traffic congestion. Our approach incorporates a flexible design to enable a mix of curbside uses—including bus stops, on-street parking, passenger and freight loading/unloading activity—as necessary to best serve the adjacent land uses. Loading zones are strategically placed and sized in anticipation of the level of use depending on the adjacent land use, consolidating loading zones where possible so that one loading zone can accommodate multiple parcels. In addition, smart parking technology will be employed between the market and the library to adjust the curbside regulation throughout the day to adapt to the changing needs of the land uses throughout the day. This flexibility enables the same curbside space to be used for loading and unloading, customer parking, or valet service.
MOBILITY
This street design considers the mobility of all users.
EQUITY
In most cities, streets make up around one-third of the city’s public space. The public right-of-way should serve everyone in the community regardless of age, mobility, income, or mode of transportation.
Our design equitably distributes space to accommodate a variety of different users, taking into account the needs of children, seniors, people with disabilities, freight operators, and people doing business. We focused our attention on designing a street that puts people first and creating a space where all users feel safe and can move as they wish.
LIVABILITY
A street not worth enjoying is a street not worth visiting.
TRANSFERABILITY
Entering competitions like this one are fun for planners and designers—within the constraints of the prompt, they allow free reign for envisioning best-in-class designs.
But this is not just an exercise in imagination. The above proposal is applicable to other Main Streets with similar characteristics. While contexts vary widely, the principles of adaptable street design remain the same: flexibility, an efficient right of way, equitable design, and a commitment to safety for all users.
Submission Team: Ben Young, Danielle Joyce, David Kaner, Julie Polak, Lauren Ormerod, Lian Farhi, Mark Bennet, Michelle Cabrera, Sarah Mawdsley, Stacey Meekins